Thursday, February 24, 2022

EUVP - European Union Visitors' Programme

 https://youtu.be/4CmlmzGtc4Q

A recent video on European Union Visitor program where my view is also mentioned.

#NiceToMeetEU #EU

Sunday, February 20, 2022

काशी का हाल: गंगा जमुनी तहज़ीब का उद्गम

 सूफी संतों की दरगाहों पर होली मनाई जाती थी और दीपावली के दिन मुगल बादशाहों के दरबारों में जश्न-ए-चिरागां का आयोजन होता था। हिन्दू पूरे उत्साह से मोहर्रम में भागीदारी करते थे तो मुसलमान हिन्दू त्योहारों का आनंद लेते थे। दक्षिण में आदिलशाही शासक इब्राहिम द्वितीय ने 'किताब-ए-नौरंग' का संकलन किया था, जिसकी पहली कविता सरस्वती देवी का आव्हान करती है। रहीम और रसखान ने भगवान कृष्ण के बारे में अतुलनीय साहित्य लिखा है। आधुनिक युग में उस्ताद बिस्मिल्ला खां हिन्दू देवी-देवताओं की शान में शहनाई बजाते थे।

ये हमारी समृद्ध सांझा संस्कृति के चन्द उदाहरण मात्र हैं। परंतु साम्प्रदायिक राष्ट्रवाद, जो इस समय दिन दूनी, रात चौगुनी गति से अपना प्रभाव बढ़ा रहा है, को इस सबसे कोई मतलब नहीं है। वह चाहता है कि हर संस्कृति, हर विचार और हर परंपरा हिन्दू संस्कृति का अंग बन जाए। तुर्रा यह है कि हिन्दू संस्कृति क्या है इसे भी वे ही परिभाषित करना चाहते हैं और इसलिए उन्हें गंगा-जमुनी तहजीब से एलर्जी है।


#Kashi #Varanasi #Fascism #Sanatan #Shraman #Benaras #Democracy #Mahadev #Pluralism #Diversity

Friday, February 11, 2022

दरोगा साहब मेरे मुँह पर लात चलाते हुए बोले तुझे प्यास लगी है:अरबिंद कुमार

 

 ‘’दरोगा साहब बोले की तुमको मार कर यही फेक देंगे कोई देखने वाला यहा नही आयेगा, तुम्हारे बूढ़े माँ-बाप भी तुम्हे ढूढ़ते ढूढ़ते मर जायेंगे’’

मेरा नाम अरबिंद कुमार उर्फ़ छोटू उम्र-30 वर्ष है| मेरे पिता का नाम बिरजू प्रसाद है| मै जाति का चमार हूँ| मै ग्राम-सोनखे दसिनीपुर, हरिजन बस्ती, पोस्ट- लमही, थाना-चोलापुर, तहसील-पिंडरा, जिला-वाराणसी का मूल निवासी हूँ|

मै अपने घर में अपने माँ बाप के साथ अकेले रहता हूँ| मेरे पिता रिक्शा चलाते थे| जिससे घर का खर्च चलता | लेकिन जब से पिता पर उन लोगो ने तेजाब ऊपर डाल दिए है| तब से उनकी तबियत ठीक नही रहती है| मै ही अपने माँ-बाप का सहारा था| लालपुर में रिक्शा चलाकर कर मै अपने घर का खर्च चला रहा था|

 13 जनवरी,2022 की तारीख थी| मै सुबह काम पर जाने के लिए अपने बड़े भाई से बोला भईया मुझे साईकिल दे दीजिये शाम को काम से आकर दे देंगे| मै साईकिल जैसे ही पकड़ कर काम पर जाने लगा| तभी मेरी भाभी निशा देवी आकर मेरे हाँथ से साईकिल छीन ली| साईकिल को लेकर कहा सुनी हो गया| मै साईकिल भाई को वापस देकर पैदल काम पर चला गया| भाभी का व्यवहार देखकर मन को बहुत तकलीफ हुई| मै दिन भर काम कर रहा था और मन ही मन सोच रहा था| जब शाम को घर आया तो अपने माँ से सारी बात बतायी| तो माँ बोली जाने दो छोडो चलो खाना खाकर सो जाओ| मै माँ की बात मानकर जाकर सो गया|

 14 जनवरी,2022 को सुबह मै घर के सामने पोखरा पर बैठा हुआ था  तभी देखे की भैया और भाभी स्कुल की तरफ जा रहे थे| मेरी नजर भाई और भाभी के तरफ पड़ी तो भाभी हमें मुक्का दिखाते हुए जा रही थी| उस समय मै कुछ समझ नही पाया| कुछ ही देर बाद तकरीबन दस बजे पुलिस पोखरा पर आयी मै कुछ समझ पाता तभी पुलिस मेरे पास आकर बोली की चलो साहब चौकी पर बुला रहे है| मै घबरा गया,आखिर मैने ऐसा किया क्या है| जो मुझे पुलिस चौकी पर बुलाया गया|मैंने डर से पुलिस वालो से कुछ नही पूछा और उनके साथ चौकी पर जाने लगा|

 पुलिस मुझे मुर्दहां चौकी पर ले जाकर बरामदे में बैठा दिया| उस वक्त मन में बहुत सवाल आ रहे थे| तभी थोड़ी देर में साहब मेरे सामने आये|मै हाँथ जोडकर खड़ा हो गया| साहब बिना कुछ पूछे डंडा उठाकर माँ बहन की भद्दी-भद्दी गाली देने लगे| मैंने डरते हुए कहा साहब मेरी गलती क्या है| लेकिन साहब ने मेरी एक नही सुनी लगातार लाठी से मेरे हाँथ पैर पर मारते रहे| मै चिल्लाता रहा साहब मुझे मत मारो| तभी वह मुझे जमीन पर गिराकर अपने बूटो से मेरे पैर पर कई बूट मारे |

मै दर्द से चिल्लाकर रोने लगा साहब मुझे छोड़ दीजिये| बहुत तकलीफ  हो रही है| उस वक्त मेरी आँख से नीला पीला दिखने लगा| मै तेज-तेज चिल्ला रहा था| लेकिन दरोगा साहब को मेरे ऊपर जरा भी रहम नही आया| ऊपर से जूता पहने ही मेरे सीने पर चढ़ गये|उस वक्त लगा मेरी जान निकल जायेगी| मै दरोगा साहब से गिडगिडाता रहा साहब मुझे छोड़ दीजिये| मेरे माता –पिता को कोई खिलाने वाला नही है| इतना सुनते ही| दरोगा जी की बात सुनकर बहुत दुःख हुआ| मैने रोते हुए पूछा साहब मेरा कसूर क्या है| तब दरोगा जी ने कहा तू हिरोईन पीता है|मुझे यह खबर मिली है| मै बोला साहब मेरे पास इतनी कमाई नही है की मै हिरोईन पियूँगा| लेकिन दरोगा साहब हिरोईन बाज बोलकर और तेज –तेज मारने लगे|

उस वक्त चिल्लाते-चिल्लाते मेरा गला सुख रहा था| मै साहब से पानी मागने लगा| तो दरोगा साहब मेरे मुँह पर लात चलाते हुए बोले तुझे प्यास लगी है| अभी तुमको पेट भर पानी पिलाऊँगा| अब तू जेल जाकर पानी पियेगा  आधा घंटा लगातार मारने के बाद दो सिपाही मुझे बाईक पर बैठाकर चोलापुर थाने ले आये | उस वक्त मै चल नही पा रहा था| उन लोगो ने मुझे बाइक से उतारा उस वक्त मै एकदम बदहवास था| शरीर में जान नही था| पुलिस हमे वही पर जमीन पर लिटा दी|

 वहा से मुझे सरकारी हॉस्पिटल ले जाया गया|हास्पिटल मे डाक्टर ने मेरा हालत देखकर पुलिस को मारने का अधिकार नही है| तुम्हे इतनी बुरी तरह  क्यों मारा डाक्टर की बात सुनकर मै रोने लगा| उस वक्त मै बेबस होकर उनकी बात सुन रहा था| वहा मुझे सुई दवा दिया गया| वापस पुलिस हमे थाने लेकर आयी|तकरीबन 2 बजे हमें भोजूबीर तहसील लेकर आये| तहसील में एक साहब बैठे थे| वहा पर लोगों ने कागज बनाया| मेरी माँ को किसी तरह सुचना मिली तो माँ तहसील आयी| मेरी हालत देखकर घबरा गयी| पुलिस वालो ने हम लोगो से एक हजार रुपया लेकर पेपर बनवाया|उसके बाद तहसील से मुझे छोड़ा गया | मुझे उस समय चलने तक की ताकत नहीं थी| मेरी माँ किसी तरह ऑटो रिजर्व कर मुझे घर ले आयी| गाँव के लोग हमें सहारा देकर बिस्तर पर ले गये| मै दर्द से कराह रहा था, मेरा दर्द कम होने का नाम ही नहीं ले रहा था| पुरी हड्डी में दर्द हो रहा था|रात भर मै दर्द से सो नही पाया|

उस दिन दिन भर बिना खाये पिये मै पुलिस की मार खाता रहा| जब से पुलिस ने हमें मारा है रात की नींद गायब हो गयी है| काम धाम सब बंद हो गया है मेरी बूढी माँ किसी तरह हमें खाना देती है| यह सब देखकर बहुत अफ़सोस होता है|अभी हर वक्त यह डर बना है की पुलिस कही मुझे दुबारा न ले जाये|इसी भय से कही आता जाता नही हूँ| हम गरीब है| हम नही चाहते की यह घटना दुबारा किसी के साथ हो|

 मै चाहता हूँ कि थानेदार पर कार्यवाही हो ताकि वह किसी गरीब के साथ दुबारा ऐसा सलूक नहीं करे और हमें इन्साफ मिले|            

 

                                                       

 

Wednesday, February 09, 2022

Benaras Convention on 26 June 2003

 
















#Pluralism #Diversity #Kashi #Banaras #Benaras #EndTorture #Fascism #Dalit #NanditaDas #OttoTausig #AmartyaSen 










Packaged food is a compulsion, accepting it and bringing transparency into it is a good thing: Lalji Desai

Packaged food is a compulsion, accepting it and bringing transparency into it is a good thing: Lalji Desai


#NCD #FOPL #UttarPradesh #FSSAI #PacketKeAndarKyaHai #Congress #SDG #India

Wednesday, February 02, 2022

Stakeholder Consultation onChildren’s Nutrition rights through Package food Labelling

“Handlooms today are the graves of living people.”

 

BANARASI SAREE WEAVING SECTOR

OF VARANASI 

 

      A study of the working conditions of the unorganised workers of these sectors.

                                                        Lenin Raghuvanshiand Shruti Nagvanshi

@

PVCHR, India 

2010

                                                                    CONTENTS                                                                                                                                                                         

Section 1

Introduction

2

 

 

Objectives of the Study

 

Section 2

The Banarasi Saree Sector of Varanasi

4

 

 

The Structure of the Banarasi Saree Industry

5

 

 

The Process of Production

6

 

 

The Various Players and Their Inter-Relationships

6

 

 

Role of Weavers’ Cooperatives and Their Degeneration

8

 

 

The Role and Situation of Women in the Banarasi Saree Sector

9

 

 

Some Costs Transferred on to Women Weavers

9

 

 

Remuneration for the Weavers in the Banarasi Saree Sector

10

 

 

Impact of Globalisation on the Banarasi Saree Sector and wages

11

 

 

Health Status and Working Conditions

13

 

 

Migration to Other Cities / Trades

13

 

 

Role of Government and Other Social Partners

14

 

 

Market Chain of Banarasi Saree Work

15

Section 3

Some Recommendations

17

 

 

Healthcare, welfare and education

18

 

 

Further studies to understand the sector better,

18

 

 

In the area of market access

19

 

 

An online portal on weaving

19

 

 

Further understanding the needs of women weavers

19

 

 

A special cell on the above sectors

19

 

 

A local museum

19

INTRODUCTION 

#India is the home to one of the finest legacies of traditional Crafts. Over 10 million artisans and their families, though mostly on the brink of survival are dependant on crafts for a living. 

#Banarasi saree weaving is seen as one of the most exquisite crafts-forms of the country. This craft is in great demand in the export market, and are high revenue earners for the govt., exporters, middlemen and others who control the trade. Two Indian cities - Varanasi in the north and Kanchipuram in the south - are famous for their elegant silk saris. India is the world's second largest producer of silk, but India only accounts for 5 percent of the global silk market. This market share was still enough to generate approximately $260 million in revenues during 1995. Germany, the largest consumer of Indian silk, imported material worth DM 540 million ($231 million) in 1995. The bulk of Indian silk thread and silk cloth, however, are consumed domestically. 

The silk industry has been expanding rapidly over the last several years, with substantial movement and international subsidies for sericulture projects and marketing schemes. In addition to government promotion, major funds to the silk industry come from the World Bank. From 1980-89, the World Bank began active promotion of the silk industry as a means of development by loaning $54 million to support sericulture in Karnataka. In 1989, the World Bank provided two more loans totalling $177 million for the National Sericulture Project of which Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh were recipients. In total, the World Bank provided a $231 million for the expansion of the industry form 1980-89. In 1994 and 1995, the Bank provided a $3 million loan to modernise the Karnataka silk industry and provided further assistance on a $157 million project to upgrade the production and quality of Indian silk. 

The exquisite traditional arts and crafts in India are under serious threat today, and are passing through a time of crisis. For the average consumer, craft is perceived to be a high maintenance, high cost product that neither wears nor functions as well as its industrial equivalent; for the craftsperson, craft is a profession that neither gives adequate economic returns nor social status.[1] The artisans and others working in the above handicrafts sectors are being hit by a multitude of problems. While the market for their hand made products shrinks in relative terms[2] due to the onslaught of cheap, imported alternatives in the wake of a globalised economy, inadequate attention to their situation by the govt., civil society organisations and others has left them on the brink of survival, to face hunger, unemployment, gross underemployment, poor living and working conditions, consequent poor health and exploitation. Lack of workers organisations in some areas and ineffective ones in other areas further accentuate the problem. 

This study attempts to highlight the state of the Banarsi Saree Sector, working conditions of artisans with special focus on women. It also seeks to look at possible future directions for improvement of the situation of artisans in these sectors in Lucknow and Varanasi.

The following were the broad objectives and scope of the Study: 

Objectives of the Study

-        To study the working conditions of women in the Banarasi sari weavers sector.

-        To examine the impact of global and resulting national policy environment on women home based workers specifically in Banarasi sari sector.

-        To examine the market functioning and demand for the products in light of the changing global economic environment on these women workers. 

The following tasks helped achieve the above objectives:

-        Examining and listing of the factors leading to the precariousness of women workers’ employment in the Banarasi sari weavers sector.

-        Analysis of labour conditions in relation to gender differentials, wage and employment conditions, opportunities, and collective bargaining rights.

-        Study of changes in the nature of their employment because of changes in policy environment at State and National level due to globalisation (from 1991).  

-        Analysis of different costs facing a woman worker vs. the wage that she is paid.

-        A look at the costs that governments and companies are shifting onto women workers through precarious employment contracts.

-        Tracing out the market supply chain of the products from the producer groups to the consumer. 

The study was not expected to be an intensive study and focuses on a range of issues that are required for program development. Based on the findings, the program for Market Access and trade would be further developed around these sectors The study thus, touches upon the above-mentioned issues and areas, to be able to give insights and direction in which to delve deeper. 

The study entailed the following:

i)                Field meetings with workers to get a first hand understanding of their problems. Case studies were undertaken to understand the working and living conditions of workers.

ii)              Trade Unions and workers organisations were located and meetings were held with them to get a better understanding of the sector and issues surrounding the workers and the functioning of the Unions.

iii)             Meetings with NGOs, practitioners, academicians, and others associated with the sector were arranged to understand the sector in a wider context, especially the impact of the New Economic Policies on the sector.

iv)             Meetings were held with the Labour Commissioner to understand the perspective of the Government.

v)               Libraries, institutes and other organisations were visited in the above cities and Delhi for review of available literature on the subject. 

THE BANARASI SAREE SECTOR OF VARANASI 

Varanasi, previously known as Benaras has been a centre of production of handloom silk since centuries. The Varanasi silk fabrics have been eulogized in scriptures and ancient books both in the Hindu as well as in the Buddhist eras.  In spite of the flourishing trade, the weaver of dream sarees was and is still working in pathetic conditions and living a life of abject poverty. 

The production technology more or less, has also remained ancient-pit type handloom where the weaver sits with his legs in the pit. The textile industry here is synonymous with silk sari industry as more than ninety five percent of the products are silk saris. During the medieval period skilled Muslim weavers from the West Asian countries came to India along with Moguls. These weavers found Varanasi complementing to their art of intricate pattern of weaving and settled there under the patronage of the then Muslim rulers. 

The fusion of Hindu design pattern with the Muslim ones aided by the local climate conducive to silk handloom weaving, put Varanasi at the helm of silk weaving activities. The artistic ingenuity of the artisans and the changing market trends has resulted in a great variety of the Banaras silk fabric. Generally the quality and type of silk fabric indicates the weavers' occupational status and artisanship. The better quality and high priced fabric requires greater artisanship, labour and financial investment.  No two sarees are the similar in quality, colour combination, design or pattern.  As a result, there can be no uniformity in rates, which has become a cause for rampant exploitation. 

Being a pilgrimage city it attracted lots of tourists who provided market to the produce. The Varanasi silk saris are characterised by their intricate pattern of weaving and heavy zari art work. 

The sari industry, which was thriving once with equity in profit for all sectors of production, is now seeing mixed fortunes. With the change in time the buyer's preferences changed. The demand for high valued intricately patterned heavy silk sari, for which Varanasi was famous, declined. Today's fashion is marked by fast change in design, low cost of production and low inventory. For the weaver, who once was at the centre stage of the industry, the time has changed too. Gone are the days when the uniqueness of the creation was appreciated and patronised at a great cost. The weaver was a producer as well as creator of designs. Now the industry in this changed scenario has shifted to producing at large volumes with low quality design at a low cost. 

Over time, designing aspect was separated from production. The continued use of the ancient production technology however proved to be a stumbling block in increasing the production. An improvement was made by incorporating a device in the handloom, which lifted the warp threads according to the design punched on paper cards so that the weft thread shuttle could weave through the design without any manual intervention. This device. Called Jacard, made it possible to reproduce any given design. 

The designs are now given to the weavers for production, thus reducing the weaver's contribution to mere supply of skilled labour in the production process. They have been cut off from the market. It is now the traders who keep pace with changing fashion trends and dictate the production. These developments had a major economic implication for the weavers. They were reduced to the status of an ordinary skilled labourer in the industry and with their supply surpassing the demand, saw declining wages. This decline in wages to weavers in turn had serious implications for their family. To survive, all able-bodied family members including children have been drawn into the labour market. 

No authoritative survey has been done so far to ascertain the number of looms and the weavers' thereof. According to a survey conducted by the U.P. Handloom Corporation in 1995-96, it reported 75,313 handlooms and 1758 power looms in the district with number of handloom weavers placed at 1,24,832 and 2645 power looms workers. However, as per industry sources, presently the number of looms and the weavers are many times more than the estimates of UP Handloom Corporation. 

The Structure of the Banarasi Saree Industry 

The sari industry is a household industry spread over the entire Varanasi district. Since the beginning of the industry, saris were woven on handlooms. In recent times power looms have also been inducted in the industry. The saris produced on handlooms are different from those produced on power looms. The yarn, the designs as also the production processes are different. Both types of saris have their separate market niche. The looms are installed within the houses but separated from the living areas and are being run mostly by family labour and partly by hired labour. 

The designs are developed by skilled designers/weavers who are engaged in the trading or employed by the traders. The designs are sent to specialised shops that translate the design into a series of punch cards. These punch cards are given to the handlooms owners where the woman members sew the punch cards into the specified series and then these cards are installed on the Jacard device placed atop the loom. 

There are two types of loom owners. One is an independent producer who buys the raw material and sells finished saris. The other type is one who is attached to a particular trader who provides design and raw material to loom owner. The payment in the case of the former is on the basis of price negotiation while in the case of latter it is a fixed conversion charge (piece rate). Many traders are also owners but they contract out their looms to weavers. 

Sari weaving has been followed as an occupation in most of the areas during the last 30 - ­40 years. It was observed in one of the areas (Baghava Nala) that the earlier generation of weavers used to go to the loom installed at the master's or Gaddidar's house. Even now, some weavers go there and their earning is about 80 per cent to that earned by a weaver if the work is done at their own houses. It may be noted that getting the work to homes is in the interest of the weavers, as the entire family can be roped in - the women and the girl children at nari hharai and the male children at dharki phenkna at the looms.

The raw material suppliers and the finished sari buyers are middlemen/traders/co­operatives. The industry used Indian silk as also silk imported from China. The powerlooms use imported silk or other fibres while the handlooms require mostly Indian silk, which comes mostly from Karnataka. 

The Process of Production 

Production of a sari on a handloom undergoes many processes. The silk yarn called Katan is reeled, bleached and dyed. The dyed yarn is prepared for Tana (warp) and Bana (weft). In case of warp reeling Tana Tanana four to five persons are needed. The length of yarn reeled on a five feet long warp cylinder is sufficient for six lengths of a saree (33 meters). Yarn for the weft is reeled on a small (few centimetres long) cylindrical object and the process is called Nari Bharna. Many such reels are needed to complete a saree. It is used in shuttle Dhirri as also to bring out the designs Buti on the sarees. Nari bharna is almost a continuous process so far the loom is running. All other processes are one-time set-up jobs. Once set-up, six sarees are produced in a row i.e. till the warp yarn is exhausted. The design set-up on Jacard lasts till next design is introduced. 

The Various Players and Their Inter-Relationships 

There are three kinds of weavers - Individual weaver, Master Weaver and Weaver of the Cooperative Society.  The most exploited of them, the Individual weaver uses one’s own material, loom, design and colour.  The most critical problem for him/her is the sale and marketing of his fabric, which he accomplishes directly or through the Gaddidar, the middleman or the trader.  The Gaddidars control the production and marketing of silk fabrics and have considerable influence upon the social, cultural, economic and political life of the weaving community.  

The Master weaver supplies material, design, colours, and the ideas.  He engages wage earners and looks after the complete operation of the weaving process and the marketing of the fabric.  The weaver (ordinary weaver – not the Master weaver) earns meagre wages for the preparation of sarees, which may take him 5-6 days to 12-15 days.  Therefore, this weaver has no option but to work hard to weave a saree in a shorter duration to earn more.  This renders weaving an activity in which weavers are exploited.  While they work harder, they in fact contribute to the greater profit of the Master weavers. Gaddidars and Master Weavers have access to the market and the demand trends. The numbers of these traders are only around three hundred. Hindus dominate the trading community while weavers are mostly Muslims. The weaver is only concerned with the production and is cut off from the market. They depend upon the traders for design and sale of their produce. In the city, the looms owners are mostly Muslims of weaving community living in different pockets/mohallas. 

The weaver has poor connections in the raw material market as well as the retail market of silk fabrics.  If the weaver goes to Gaddidar with a finished product, he may point out many defects viz. stains, defective design or pattern, motifs, etc. After considerable haggling, the final deal is struck. The weaver is often given a post-dated cheque of a faraway bank.  In need of immediate hard cash, the weaver goes to the commission agent with the cheque and gets money after paying 2-3 percent commission.  The weaver, in need of hard cash, may sell his product directly, but is forced to accept a cheap rate. 

Till the recent past, the Banarasi Silk Saree trade was entirely in the hands of Hindu traders belonging to the trading communities. Their shops are located in Kunjgali locality in the city. Weaving was entirely in the hands of weaving community among the Muslims. The traders had the capital and links to the markets in India to carryover their trade. Both the Hindu traders and Muslim weavers had a peaceful coexistence. The relationship between the two, however, has gone through periods of strains. 

The weavers, cut off from the market, were not able to actively participate in the price negotiation of their produce and depended upon the trader's mercy. The traders had twin advantages-market information and mercantile capital. With the growth in the population of weavers, more and more skilled labour was added to the industry while there was little growth in the demand. Increasing supply of labour saw decreasing price/wages to the weavers. At the same time, the fluctuating prices of silk and artificial shortages created by the suppliers caught the weavers in a precarious situation. The increase in prices of silk also made it out of the reach of many poor weavers who switched over to cheap artificial fibres. This led them to start using relatively poor quality of raw material, where the piece rate earning is much less than those out of the weaving done by using the better quality of the raw material. 

There is a slight difference in the earnings of an independent loom owner and those attached to a trader. Normally an independent loom owner should get a better price but lack of holding capacity and fluctuating raw material prices force them to compromise with the payment delaying tactics of the traders. This apart, the traders often find quality excuses on grounds of flaws in the quality of weaving to make deductions from even the agreed price. Due to such machinations of the trading community, the earnings of the weavers ultimately comes down to piece rate (conversion charges) irrespective of the status of a weaver - independent or attached. However, in majority of cases the payments to the weavers are made on a piece-rate basis. The normal piece rate varies from Rs.300 to Rs.I000 for a silk saree on handloom, depending upon the complexity of the design. The number of days it takes to complete a piece of saree depends upon the design and normally varies from three to 15 days. Some designs may even take a month. 

The saree industry is not seeing much growth in demand whereas the growing population is adding more and more skilled labour on the production side. The reasons for such an influx of labour are obvious. The weaving skill is passed down from one generation to the next in the weaver's family. The weavers are often illiterate, have relatively less ‘security’ of survival of their kin due to lack of awareness / poor healthcare infrastructure, and are afflicted with myriad social problems characteristic to poor, marginalised communities. This makes them prone to having large families, and live under the illusion that there is assured employment in the weaving trade,. As the children of the weavers grow up, they set up their own looms or work as hired labour on others' loom. Lack of education and alternative employment opportunities force them to continue in their own traditional trade. Then migration of weavers from city to rural areas exposed the rural labour to this trade. The rural labour found this trade offering better returns compared to working as marginal agricultural labour and they too adopted weaving. 

This mismatch between demand and supply of labour and consequent declining profits for the loom owners on the one hand and lack of alternative opportunities in other sectors of economy on the other hand proved to be a genesis to all sorts of social malaise in the industry. Weavers were being attached with Master Weavers for a little amount of loan (either in cash or in the form of raw material) incurred by them and likewise labour including child labour gets attached to loom owners. In other words, the industry has both bonded adult and child labour as well as bonded loom owners. 

The worst sufferers are the children. Compelled with requirements to maintain their earnings, the weavers make their children sit on the looms. Their help in creating design pattern (Buti) and operating the shuttle (Dharki phekna) speeds up production process. If the weavers have looms more than what his family member could operate, hired lahour and hired children come in. Hired children can be sold and bought for a little amount or loan extended to their parents. A bonded person however can move from one owner to another provided the new looms owner pays off the outstanding debt to the first loom owner. 

Role of weavers’ cooperatives and their degeneration 

The plight of the weavers attracted the attention of the government, which intervened with the establishment of co-operative institutions. The objective was to end the isolation of weavers from the market and vertically integrate them with the source of supply of raw material on the one hand and with the actual market on the other. Aspects of micro-credit were also incorporated in their functioning. 

Being plagued with mismanagement and corruption, cooperatives failed in their appointed task. Benefits failed to reach the poor weavers. A few resourceful persons among the weavers pocketed benefits by floating fictitious co-operatives. These handfuls of beneficiaries within the Muslim weavers emerged as another set of traders calling themselves as Master Weavers rather than Gaddidars. They use this terminology as a justification for obtaining continued benefits from the co-operatives. Thus the industry has now two sets of traders, Hindus as Gaddidars and Muslims as Master Weavers. 

For the poor weavers, both Gaddidars and Master Weavers are one and the same and are being perceived as belonging to the same flock. The Gaddidars / Master Weavers get workers cards issued from the silk cooperatives, and obtain silk raw material from the cooperatives as workers. The cooperatives claim that after accounting for all the working expenses, the profit is distributed among the weavers at the end of the year.  Unfortunately this is not the case.  

Weavers share is used as a working capital, bank loans and for various other schemes.  The members are supposed to be provided with insurance, and have access to the Thrift funds. The Master weavers, with the help of dummy memberships of the cooperatives, try to appropriate the benefits which are actually given by the Government to the cooperative societies.  The provision of insurance and various other funds exist only on paper. 

Therefore, instead of ameliorating the plight of the weavers, it can be inferred that the Govt. established cooperative institutions created further misery for them, by helping create another set of exploiters – the master weavers. The co-operative intervention has made a very conspicuous difference in their lives. It has created islands of affluence in an otherwise poor locality of weavers. One will find a sprinkling of palatial buildings sharply contrasting with the poor dilapidated houses of the weavers in the decaying Madanpura Muslim locality where most of the Master Weavers are living. Another fall out of this affluence was displacement of poor weavers living in the adjoining houses of the Master weavers. The locality is so dense that there is no place left for expansion. Thus the poor weavers were offered ‘attractive’ prices to sell their houses to their affluent neighbours. The displaced weavers migrated to rural areas. Lack of space to accommodate the growing population also lead to migration of weavers to rural areas. 

The role and situation of women in the Banarasi Saree Sector 

The involvement of women in the various processes of saree weaving is primarily a response to supplement the family incomes, particularly, if the family is not in a position to hire workers or to a small extent if the number of persons who could work on saree weaving is relatively less in the family. The latter, however, does not seem to be an important factor as the average family size was in the range of 6-8. The case of adult females working as hired labour in the saree industry is also less and it is only in select pockets such as Lohata - a village having a high concentration of saree weaving. The attempt to augment family incomes, given the low piece rate wages in nari bharai and also the financial constraints faced in setting up even a handloom appeared to be important push factors for adult females to move out of their homes and choose to work as hired labour, despite social constraints. 

The roles that women in the Banarasi Saree weaving process play are critical in the process of weaving, but is neither given the recognition nor remuneration due to them. Most of the work done by women is strenuous, repetitive, and un-stimulating. The work of saree katran[3] is done by women. This work is done by continuously sitting for 6-7 hrs.  The women, who do the cutting, earn Rs. 5 – 15/- per day by their work. These women are unorganised. The cutting work is usually carried out at home. 

The Gaddidar provides the sarees for the katran work. Anta and Nari filling[4] and cutting work are carried out by women. It takes 7 to 15 days to produce each saree. In the Silk saree-weaving sector, non-involvement of women is the norm. Women are involved in the menial tasks such as the above mentioned ‘nari bharna’, ‘taana kheechna’, ‘anta bharna’, making holes in cardboards for jacards, cutting of threads and finishing of the woven saree. There is no monetary compensation for these tasks, which are conveniently ignored from the entire saree weaving process. Women are not allowed to sit on the handlooms, as it is seen that women are weak and cannot sit on these machines. There is no attempt to adapt the looms in accordance with the needs of women. In addition, there is a feeling that if the women were to come on the looms, men will lose their jobs, and the cost of the saree will drop drastically. 

Some costs transferred on to #women  #weavers 

In the #Banarasi #Saree Sector, the various players transfer costs to women, who bear the brunt of subsidising the production. In fact if the women did not do the menial jobs without getting any remuneration, the cost of the finished product would be much higher than what it is at present. By not providing adequate healthcare and welfare infrastructure for the women workers the Government is culpable of transferring this cost on to women, who often suffer silently or live considerably reduced life spans. 

Women working for long hours, in the absence of crèche or day care facilities for the children implies a lost childhood for the children of weavers. This is an unfortunate cost that is thrust upon the children and women of the weaving communities. The children pay in terms of a lost childhood, no or less education, poor parenting and suffer consequences when they attain adulthood. Many children are drawn towards drugs, criminal elements and indulge in other undesirable / anti-social activities. 

Gaddidars and master weavers along with the male weavers / members of a family transfer significant production costs (eg. Nari bharai) on the women members of the household. This cost goes un-accounted for while deciding the market price of the finished product. Measuring the financial implications on the transfer of the above costs on to women of the sector needs further attention. 

Remuneration for the weavers in the Banarasi Saree Sector 

There are no other employment opportunities. Most of the adult weavers reported to have started working in the industry right from their early days of childhood. As regards wages, they are able to weave a saree in nearly 10 days and for this get something around Rs. 350-400, the actual sum depending upon the quality of the weaving. An average weaver in this area was reported to be working for nearly 12 hours a day. During the marriage season when the demand for Banarasi sarees increase and also during the Id festivals when the need for ready cash is more, most of the weavers reported to increase their working hours to nearly 16 hours a day. 

In the context of wage determination, regarding what is the basis of this settlement- what kind of bargaining and negotiating mechanisms are used in the entire process, it is the dismal truth that there is no system of a written contract, the weavers go and buy raw silk from the market or from the Gaddidars. If it is the latter, then it is an advance by the Gaddidars to the weavers and when the weavers have finally woven the saree, the Gaddidars generally take it. Till the time the saree is not sold in the market, the weavers do not get anything. The other arrangement is that a weaver gets the design and silk from the Gaddidars and then weaves a sari, (the weaving normally is spread on an average between 7-10 days) and the saree is then given back to the Gaddidars. The weaver gets a wage payment, only when the saree is sold. In order to manage his cash requirements, in the intervening period, he, may have to resort to taking advances from the Gaddidars - the weavers enters into a form of bondage with the creditor. Such practices are also common in the saree industry. The possibility of additional wage earnings, coupled with no assistance from the weaver's co-operatives forces the weavers to take their children out of school and ask them to work at homes in saree weaving. 

It came as a surprise that in saree weaving areas though a large number of weavers' families have been into this occupation for the last two to three generations (such as in Baghava Nala), most of them do not have a completely owned loom. All looms are on contract and are owned by Gaddidars of Bari Bazaar, who provide the weavers with the necessary raw materials. The weavers, we were told, are capable of earning about Rs. 400-500 for a saree, which in turn requires about 8-10 days to be completed. There has been virtually no increase in the wages for the past five years. Most of the women folk of the family are involved in nari bharai and children work for nearly 16-20 hours over a period of a week. 

The weavers, it appeared have come to terms to live with such low wages and refrain from making any effort to set up their own looms, whereby they could ask their terms and conditions to be met vis-a-vis the Gaddidars. This is because the weavers feel that, if they set up their own looms, then their own funds would get blocked. This is because their ‘staying capacity’ is too low to sustain during the lead-time when the saree is given to the Gaddidar and payment is received. During the financial crisis, most of the weavers tend to take an advance from the Gaddidars. They are not willing to incur any loan from the local moneylenders. In Baghva Nala again, the weavers manage to get a minimum of Rs.500/- in addition to the amount they have "saved" with the Gaddidar. The repayment of this is done in equal instalments of Rs. 50/- at the time when completed sari is given to the Gaddidar. Only in a few selected places such as Baghava Nala, were the weavers found to be able to perceive that by taking advance or loan from the Gaddidars they actually get into some sort of bondage, till the entire loan is repaid. 

For most of others, the element of indebtedness is not there because no interest is paid on the amount taken from the Gaddidar. At times, they might feel harassed at the hands of these Gaddidars. On such occasions, the weavers look for a new master/Gaddidar, who pays the loan incurred by the weaver. In this way, the weavers keep on working for one master/Gaddidar or another. The form of bondage remains the same, only hands change. 

Impact of globalisation on the Banarasi Saree Sector and wages 

The demand of finished sarees has gone down over the years. Since the 1990s’ the labour wages have declined to about half of what they were earlier. The saree quality has gone up, compared to what they were those days. Also, in earlier days, the sarees used to be of 5 metres, but now they are 6 metres, while wages have not shown any commensurate increase. Also, the power looms are snatching the work from the laps of the weavers. Middlemen and Gaddidars are living like parasites on their earnings. 

Shopkeepers on the one hand give difficult designs to weavers and on the other claim that there are no buyers for the finished products. Such excuses using the vulnerability of weavers are often used to further tighten the noose on the necks of the weavers, as any cutbacks in number of orders has a crippling effect on their already precarious economic status. Thus weavers assume a greater onus of getting the work. Also they have additional tasks these days, such as cutting of jacard cardboard designs, which was earlier, not their responsibility. 

A weaver sits from 8:00 AM till 6:00 PM for 10 to 12 days and earns approximately Rs. 350/- on one saree, which gets produced in this much time. During this period, he takes help for all the Nari, Dharki and Anta filling needed for the job, from his family – primarily the womenfolk in the household, thus reducing them to the status of unpaid workers. Though important, these tasks are not given the status and value that they deserve, and are usually not included when the pricing of the saree / labour wage fixing is done. According to activist and thinker Ms. Muniza Khan of the Gandhian Institute of Studies, Varanasi, “ The plight of women is such that even if they earn Rs.10/- they do not have the right to spend it. They work, trapped in dark hovels like chicken. Their contribution does not have the kind of recognition that it deserves. Their contribution is not accounted for while the product pricing is done. There has been no work done with women, and for any change to happen in the sector, their education, organisation and struggle for their rights will need utmost priority.” 

The story of the raw material is no better. As regards the availability of raw silk, it appears that the industry is going through a phase of crisis. There is often an artificial scarcity of raw material created by traders. If a small weaver was to go to the market to buy silk, then it would be difficult for him/her to buy in larger quantities, by way of buying a gathia (bundle)- which normally has 5-6 kilograms of raw silk. The smaller weavers cannot buy in such huge quantities, because they do not have the purchasing power and because they do not have enough business in which the raw silk, if purchased could be used. This indicates that the interventions by the government co-operatives or community co­operatives in helping the weavers to gain easy access to the most important raw material i.e. silk, has been not of much positive consequence, as the small and marginal weavers are left out in the bargain. They also do not have enough money at their disposal to block it by way of purchase of raw silk at the so-called subsidised rates offered by the co­operative. It is apparent that, the whole structure of the co-operatives is to allow the bigger weavers to take the advantage of the subsidy offered. 

Bangalore silk is good but expensive. Earlier it was an important raw material, as it used to be available in abundance, and that too at cheap prices. Prior to 1990, the cost of this silk used to be Rs. 100/- per kg. Now it is available at over Rs 1500/- per kg. The entry of the multinationals is doing harm to the sector. Imported Chinese silk is cheaper. Chinese silk, brought in from Nepal, is available at Rs. 1100/- per kg, and hence it has become the choice of most artisans. While multinational players are being given a free hand to operate, potentially weaver friendly institutions such as cooperatives are being allowed to decay, at the cost of the marginalised weaver. 

Surat produces artificial silk thread, which is available at a much lower cost. Also, the Banarasi saree designs are being copied and duplicate Banarsi sarees are being produced, using artificial material. Entry of artificial silk has hurt the sector in terms of reduced business. This puts pressure to reduce the cost of the finished Banarasi saree in the market. As the middlemen and shopkeepers do not forsake their profits, the weakest link, i.e. the saree weaver has to bear the brunt, in terms of reduced wages. 

The low economic status of the weavers is due to a number of factors.  When the product is substandard or the product loses its demand in the market, the weaver has to sell it at a price that may not even cover his labour cost.  In the weaving industry, imitation is not valued. The product with a unique design, pattern and texture commands a high price.  As soon as the design is copied, the product gets devalued.  The weaver has to bear this loss. Change of product invariably involves substantial investment that affects the weavers adversely. Power operated looms also compound the problem, as an electricity connection is not easy to come by.  Moreover, continued declared and undeclared power cuts add to the agony.  

Health status and working conditions 

Weavers sit on hand loom machines to weave the sarees. As most of the looms are situated at the residence where there is no adequate ventilation and provision of light, it results in weavers being afflicted by weak eyesight and serious respiratory ailments including byssinosis[5], which is an occupational disease, and is often inadequately diagnosed as TB.  The nature of the machinery requires the loom system to be partially embedded into the ground, and for a worker to sit, one needs to make a pit for the weaver to be able to keep his legs. In the pit where the temperature is different resulting in the numbness of the lower portion of the body. In fact in the words of Arjun, a weaver, “Handlooms today are the graves of living people.” 

In addition, the reduction of labour wages has had a direct, negative impact on their nutritional status. They fall sick easily, and diseases such as TB, Pneumoconiosis, swelling of their legs, stomach ailments, backache, anaemia, weakness and debility etc. which are common ailments, as far as Banarasi silk weavers are concerned. 

As wages are poor, an average worker does not consider health to be a major priority. Food, housing, transport, loan repayment and other expenses have a greater priority in the lives of the weavers. Women do not go to seek medical advice unless they are bedridden. Even in such circumstances, they feel guilty of ‘using the precarious family financial resources on oneself.’ 

Weavers look forward to much better healthcare facilities than what exist today. In the words of Abdulla Ansari[6] “The weavers suffer from ailments, which need special attention, as they are in any case weak and fall ill easily owing to their poor living and working conditions. Private medical practitioners only look at earning money from the poor weavers and their families, while the Govt. neglects them. It would be ideal to have govt. run medical facilities for the workers and their families, and such a facility could be run on the lines of the ESIC hospitals.” 

#Migration to other cities / trades 

The exploitation in the sector has reached such serious proportions, the many skilled artisans have left weaving and begun to do other work, such as pulling rickshaws, making incense sticks, peeling and selling green chanas (seasonal work), and the women have begun to do domestic labour in the homes of middle class families in their neighbourhood. In addition, weavers are leaving Varanasi and migrating to Surat. This is due to the better status of weavers in that city, which has a better demand for their products and provides better wages for their work. In fact in Surat, many weavers are ironically joining the ‘duplicate’ Banarasi saree manufacturing process, as it is becoming increasingly economically viable to do that. Influx of thousands of ‘unskilled’ workers into weaving from the rural hinterland due to exigencies in their areas coupled with the abandoning of the sector by rare skilled crafts persons, if left unchecked can sound the death knell of the sector itself, thus depriving humankind of one of its finest traditions. 

Role of government and other social partners 

On the availability of various government services, the most talked about issue was that of loans and credits from banks. Though a section of the weavers are of the view that the government has been concerned towards their plight and was trying to do things at the policy level and was willing to advance loans at subsidised rates, the blame mainly lies with the delivery mechanism and the agencies involved in the implementation of these support systems. It was learnt that most of the time the banks deduct up to 40 per cent of the sanctioned amount. Such a state of affairs, makes the weavers wary of any government financial help and thus they prefer not to take any financial help, whatsoever from the government. 

Some weavers also revealed that some loan facility had been announced about 10-12 years back and in fact some weavers had also got some benefit under it - but the whole issue of repayment has been mired in controversy, at the level of administration and the politicians- whether the loan should be waived or not. 

The issue of power problem was clearly seen. This holds even for the handloom weavers, for the fact that wherever the looms are installed, no natural light is available, and thus the lack of adequate power supply hampers the work of the weavers. The burden of electricity. bills is very high and the weavers are facing problems in clearing those outstanding bills. For them, even if a loan were to be offered to clear these bills, they would not go for it, as they feel that would again be caught in the same quagmire of rising burden of loans. 

Some 90 per cent of the weavers have not been able to pay their electricity bills, which is ranging between Rs.50,000 to ­Rs.1,50,000/- for a large number of families. Many families (about 150 in Jamaluddinpura) sold their houses for payment of their electricity bills and have gone to the other localities (such as Chaubeypur and Kanwarpur). It was also said that while the 90 per cent of them are burdened with over dues in terms of payment for electricity bills, the remaining 10 per cent do not have enough money to get a connection - they are thus stealing electricity. 

On the issue of silk price, it generally hovers in the range of Rs. 1100-1600 per kilogram. In fact, some of the weavers said that a few months back the price in the government co-operatives had been higher than the price in the open market. Generally, the government price is + or - Rs. 50-60 when compared to the open market price. When a large quantity of silk is imported from China, then the price of silk may fall as low as Rs. 1000-1200. But then the price of the final product also falls and therefore, the adverse impact falls on the wages paid to the weavers. 

On the issue of interventions made by co-operatives, we learnt that almost every locality in the urban areas has weavers' co-operatives. However, the general feeling is that the weavers are antagonistic to the style of functioning of these co-operatives. Most of the benefits from these co-operatives have only accrued to a select few. "Co-operatives are basically a one man beneficiary. However, during periods of shortages or silk supply there are a few occasions when some more weavers (who are in the good books of the committee members) do get some raw material. 

As regards, loans for setting up a handlooms, which requires about Rs. 8000-10000, bank loans are preferable to those offered by the co-operatives. In fact, most of the loanable funds available with the co-operatives have been reportedly used by the functionaries of the co-operatives. There is an apparent lack of community participation to ask for loans from government sources. This is despite the fact that the weavers are aware of the various government schemes. The weavers are wary of taking any loans from such sources, whereby they would again be caught in complex web of loan related problems. 

MARKET CHAIN OF BANARASI SAREE WORK 

In the market chain of Banarasi Saree work as seen in the diagram – 1, there are multiple and complicated stages that the raw material undergoes, before it comes out as a finished Banarasi Saree. The process is long, and the end product reaches the Gaddidar / Grahastha, who have the overall control on the process. The workers are usually at the mercy of the Gaddidar / Grahastha, as they decide the returns that the weavers and other artisans get at the end of their work, and are firmly under the grip of the Gaddidar / Grahastha.

The arrows in the diagram represent the flow of raw material. After the arrival of the raw material from Surat, China or Bangalore, it reaches the handloom owner, individual weaver or power loom owner through the silk cooperatives / silk wholesaler. Subsequent to that the raw material undergoes various value addition stages, after which the weaver weaves the saree. 

Each value addition stage from the taaniwala to the dyeing process (shown by small arrows) is handled by artisans, who are experts in their trade. Finally the woven saree goes back to the handloom owner / powerloom owner, in case the raw material was taken from them (depicted by thick arrows). The finished saree reaches the market via the Gaddidar / grahastha / kothedar. The finishing of the saree is done at the level of the Gaddidar / grahastha / kothedar (small 2 sided arrows depict this exchange of finished products).then the workers groups and improve the lot of unorganised sector workers, especially women, concentrated efforts are needed from multi-stakeholders, including civil society organisations, govt., workers’ unions, media, corporate sector and others. 

Given in Table – 1, is the summary of the main problems affecting the Banarasi Saree Weaving Sector. At a glance, we can also understand the problems, the larger issue involved, the affected sections, the perpetrators and some recommendations to deal with the problems. Detailed recommendations follow the table.

 Table – 1        Recommendations to deal with main Problems of the Banarasi Saree Sector. 

Problem

Issue

Affected

Perpetrator

Recommendations

Poor Wages for weavers, No wages to women for tasks appearing ‘menial’

Fair Trade

Weavers and their families.

·       Gaddidars / Master Weaver.

·       society at large.

·       other traders.

·       Establishment / revival of trade unions, cooperatives and other workers organisations.

·       Campaign on fair trade amongst patrons.

·       Portal of weavers for direct access.

·       Direct market access mechanisms, such as ‘artisan haats’ at local and National level

Poor Health of weavers and their families

·       Health and welfare

·       Govern-ance.

Weavers/ families. Severity of Impact varies across gender / age / occupation

·       Employers

·       Govt.

 

·       Establishment of specialised health care mechanisms.

·       Crèches and day care centres.

·       Preventive and promotive health programmes / awareness generation.

·       Framework to study and deal with occupational health issues.

Poor working conditions

·       Welfare.

·       Enforce-ment of labour laws.

Weavers – impact varies across gender.

·       Gaddidar

·       Traders.

·       Establishment / revival of trade unions, cooperatives and other workers organisations.

·       Sensitisation of Govt. office(s) especially enforcement wings of labour commissioners office(s).

Inadequate / costly raw material

Fair Trade

Weavers

·       International Trade .

·       Local Traders.

·       Govt.

·       Establishment of silk depots for weavers.

·       Reforms and transparency in licensing mechanisms.

Low dignity of work, non-recognition of contribution of weavers as ‘artisans’

Dignity

Weavers and their families.

·       Society at large.

·       Govt.

·       Gaddidars and traders.

 

·       Museum at local and National levels, giving history of Banarasi Saree weaving.

·       Educational programmes on mass media.

Poor electric supply

Governance

Weavers and their families.

Government.

·       Establishment / revival of trade unions, cooperatives and other workers organisations and then-

·       Sustained petitioning with the concerned dept. – UPSEB.

 Healthcare, welfare and education. In the area of health, it is important that at least one dedicated hospital be established in Lucknow and Varanasi, to look after the workers of these sectors. This is important as occupational diseases such as byssinosis, numbness in the limbs, deterioration of eyesight etc. need special attention, which is not available in general hospitals. The Sambhavana Trust Hospital in Bhopal[7], established to give specialised medical care to gas victims in the aftermath of the Bhopal Gas Disaster, the dedicated Employees State Insurance Corporation hospitals set up in various parts of the country under the ESI Scheme, and the Chattisgarh Miners Shramik Sangh (CMSS)[8]Trade Union run hospital are some examples of specialised medicare which can be studied and their best practices replicated. 

Crèches and educational / nutritional facilities for children of working mothers would need to be established, to ensure participation of women, and proper care of their children during their absence from home. Organisations such as the Mobile Crèches, who have experience of working with the children of the unorganised sector could be contacted for trainings / running of the centres. 

Learning exposure programmes for weavers, who could go to states like AP, Tamil Nadu etc. to learn about the workers struggles and best practices in these states. This programme could be run on an exchange basis. Establishment of night schools to enhance literacy amongst weavers could be of immense help, to tackle the issue of illiteracy amongst the weavers. 

Further studies to understand the sector better, and map best practices for learning, even from other states are needed. For example, the framework of the Bharat Bunkar Kendra, established by the Govt. during the 1960s needs to be studied, and revitalised. This could help weavers even today. Similarly silk licensing mechanism needs to be understood, as politics of licensing is of critical relevance to the upliftment single weaver. 

In the area of market access, establishment of professionally managed cooperatives will help in the establishments of middlemen free distribution facilities for the artisans to sell their products.  Establishment of a cooperative bank / Thrift and Credit Society of weavers could help in making capital accessible to weavers at low interest rates, thus helping them to become free of moneylenders and middlemen. Establishment of ‘haats’ and exhibitions in Varanasi and other cities is also recommended. In Varanasi, a permanent exposition on the lines of ‘Dilli Haat’ would also be useful. Besides this, up-gradation / integration of weavers expositions into the traditional melas of Varanasi would be immensely beneficial. 

An online portal on weaving could go a long way in spreading awareness and to promote the sectors, with facilities for sales. The online portal could dramatically enhance direct market access to weavers, and for the purpose, a dynamic section, having frequent update facility of an online directory of weavers could be of immense use. 

Further understanding the needs of women weavers and creation of special enabling mechanisms to help facilitate their role in the industry is needed. These could include designing special looms built with their needs in mind. Special fund for women weavers could help them becoming economically independent. 

A special cell on the above sectors needs to be established in the office of the handicrafts commissioner, for any grievances and complaints. Information regarding this cell and its functions would need to be disseminated for its successful functioning. 

A local museum needs to be established, to document the various practices in the concerned sectors. This museum could go a long way in helping the artisans understand practices in different sectors and regions. It could also help in making different sections of the population aware of the sector, and appreciate the nuances of production, which is taken for granted. This effort could go a long way in helping artisans know and appreciate their past heritage, instilling pride and ownership. 

Some other recommendations 

-        Study of other weaving systems used in the North – Eastern states and in other countries needs to be undertaken to improve loom design, especially with reference to women’s needs. 

-        Special shops selling the products ‘directly from weavers’ need to be established, to ensure better prices to weavers. Establishment of ‘silk depots’ for easy availability of raw material. 

-        Better electricity supply could ensure better lighting. 

-        Standardisation mechanisms for some sarees can be explored.   


[1] Tyabji Laila (2003) ‘The Problem’ in ‘Celebrating Craft’ Seminar Issue #523, Delhi. 

[2] While markets are increasing for crafts as well as for mass produced factory products, they are increasing at a much greater rate for the latter, thus resulting in the loss in relative terms for the market share of the former. 

[3] Cutting. 

[4] Winding of different spools used in the weaving process.

[5] An occupational respiratory disease characterised by shortness of breath, cough and wheezing. The condition is an allergic reaction to dust and fungi in cotton, flax and hemp fibres. Prolonged exposure of many years results in chronic airway obstruction, bronchitis, and emphysema with fibrosis, leading to respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale. [Glanze Walter D. (1993) Mosby’s Medical Dictionary, Galgotia Publications Pvt. Limited, New Delhi.] 

[6] Abdulla Ansari is an Office Bearer of the Bunkar Sewa Samiti, Varanasi.

[7] Sambhavna Trust Hospital is a medical centre run by a Trust consisting of the gas victims, their organisations and concerned individuals and organisations. 

[8] CMSS is a Trade Union of miners in Dalli Rajhara. It is known for its work with notable contribution of Late Sh. Shankar Guha Neogi, the landmark Trade Unionist. The Trade Union runs various welfare schemes including a hospital for workers and their families to look after their specialised Medicare needs.

Featured Post

Tireless Service to Humanity

Dear Mr. Lenin Raghuvanshi, Congratulations, you have been featured on Deed Indeed's social platform. ...