Friday, December 26, 2025

When a Newborn Dies, Accountability Cannot Be Stillborn: NHRC Flags Gaps, Compensation Remains Unaddressed

The death of a newborn is not merely a medical outcome—it is a human rights issue when questions of negligence, accountability, and compensation remain unanswered. A recent communication from the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in a case from Sahibganj, Jharkhand, exposes serious institutional gaps that continue to deny justice to a grieving family.

The Case: Death of a Newborn in a Private Nursing Home

On 27 February 2025, a newborn baby died at Jhumawati Private Nursing Home, Sahibganj. The family alleged medical negligence, naming the attending gynecologist and hospital staff. Following the death:

  • The family lodged a written complaint at Jirawadi Police Station

  • Allegations were raised regarding negligent treatment

  • The incident triggered public outrage and distress

A complaint was filed before the NHRC on 28 February 2025, seeking justice, accountability, and appropriate action.

NHRC Proceedings: Serious Lapses in Inquiry

The NHRC took cognizance of the matter on 14 July 2025, directing the Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Sahibganj and the Superintendent of Police to submit an Action Taken Report (ATR).

While the police submitted a report claiming:

  • No negligence by doctors

  • Proper and skillful conduct of surgery

  • Weak heart rate of the newborn despite efforts

The NHRC found serious deficiencies in this inquiry:

  • No independent medical expert opinion

  • Victim’s family not associated with the inquiry

  • No response from the Chief Medical Officer, despite reminders

Recognizing these gaps, the NHRC has now issued a final reminder to the CMO, directing submission of a complete report by 25 January 2026, with oversight by the District Magistrate.

The Missing Conversation: Compensation for the Family

One crucial issue remains conspicuously absent from official responses—compensation.

Under constitutional and human rights jurisprudence:

  • The death of a newborn in institutional care engages Article 21 – Right to Life

  • Where negligence or procedural lapses are alleged, the State has a duty to ensure effective remedy

  • Compensation is a human rights remedy, not dependent on criminal conviction

Even where negligence is disputed, ex gratia compensation is routinely recommended by the NHRC in cases involving:

  • Maternal and neonatal deaths

  • Private hospitals functioning under state regulation

  • Failure of oversight by health authorities

The prolonged silence on compensation reflects a troubling reality: families are left to grieve without relief, support, or acknowledgment of loss.

Accountability Beyond Paper Reports

The NHRC has rightly noted that:

  • Police inquiries alone are insufficient in medical negligence cases

  • Expert medical boards and transparent procedures are essential

  • Families must be heard, not sidelined

Without an independent inquiry and meaningful relief, official reports risk becoming tools of institutional self-protection, rather than justice.

A Larger Pattern of Denial

Across India, cases involving:

  • Newborn deaths

  • Maternal mortality

  • Private nursing homes
    often end with delayed inquiries, inconclusive findings, and no compensation.

This case from Sahibganj highlights how:

  • Regulatory authorities fail to act promptly

  • Medical accountability mechanisms remain weak

  • Victims’ families are pushed into silence through delay

Justice Must Include Compensation

The NHRC’s intervention is significant—but justice cannot stop at reminders.

True justice in this case demands:

  1. An independent medical expert inquiry

  2. Participation of the victim’s family

  3. Time-bound compensation to the parents

  4. Systemic corrective measures against regulatory failures

A newborn’s life may have been brief—but its value is immeasurable. Compensation is not a price on life; it is a recognition of loss, responsibility, and the State’s obligation to protect its most vulnerable citizens.

From: <nhrc.india@nic.in>
Date: Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 4:35 PM
Subject: Additional Information Called for(AIC) -187/34/17/2025
To: <dc-sah@nic.in>, <dmo-sahibganj@jharkhandmail.gov.in>, <pvchr.adv@gmail.com>



NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
MANAV ADHIKAR BHAWAN BLOCK-C, GPO COMPLEX, INA, NEW DELHI- 110023
Fax No.: 011-24651332    Website: www.nhrc.nic.in
(Law Division)
Case No.- 187/34/17/2025

Date : 18/12/2025  
To,
THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate and Collector,
SAHIBGANJ JHARKHAND
Email- dc-sah@nic.in

THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
SAHIBGANJ JHARKHAND
Email- dmo-sahibganj@jharkhandmail.gov.in

 
Sub : Complaint/ Intimation from

DR LENIN RAGHUVANSHI
SA 4/2 A DAULATPUR, PANDEYPUR VARANASI
VARANASI , UTTAR PRADESH
221002
Email- pvchr.adv@gmail.com , Mob No- 9935599331

 
Subject: Additional Information Called for(AIC) -187/34/17/2025.
 
Sir/ Madam,
 
         I am directed to say that the matter was considered by the Commission on 18/12/2025 and the Commission has directed as follows.:
         

1. The Commission received a complaint on 28.02.2025 about medical negligence in Sahibganj, Jharkhand. The complainant alleged that a newborn died due to alleged negligence by doctors at Jhumawati Private Nursing Home, Following the incident, the family created a disturbance at the hospital and filed a written complaint at Jirawadi police station, accusing Dr. Snehlata Kumari of negligence. The police have started an investigation, and the family has demanded strict legal action against the doctor.

2. The Commission vide proceeding dated 14.07.2025, took cognizance in the matter and directed as under:
“Let a copy of the complaint be transmitted to the Chief Medical Officer, Sahibganj, Jharkhand and Superintendent of Police, Sahibganj, Jharkhand, through online mode, to ensure the needful action and submit the action taken report duly translated in English to the Commission within four weeks.”

3. Following issuance of direction, the Superintendent of Police, Sahibganj, submitted report dated 09.10.2025 wherein it is submitted that in light of the complaint received, an inspection and investigation were conducted at Jhumavati Hospital, Sahibganj. During the investigation, Dr. Snehalata, Gynecology and Obstetrics Specialist; Dr. Sandeep, Pediatric Specialist; Dr. Rehan Alam, Anesthesia Specialist; and the attending ANMs, Snehalata Kumari and Monika Soren, present at Jhumavati Hospital, were examined and questioned in connection with the matter.

The hospital registers and other documents available at Jhumavati Hospital were examined. From the records, it was found that the patient was admitted on 22.02.2025 and discharged on 24.02.2025. Examination of other documents revealed that the patient had been receiving treatment and regular check-ups at Jhumavati Hospital for a long time, which were conducted periodically by Dr. Snehalata. Other doctors stated that the operation was conducted very carefully and skillfully in the presence of all concerned, and the baby was delivered. However, the baby’s heart rate was weak. All specialist doctors made full efforts to save the baby and restore the heart rate, but the baby could not be saved. Thereafter, the relatives gathered a crowd, created chaos and disturbance, and forcibly took the baby’s body despite being asked to provide written consent prior to removal.

4. The Commission has considered the material placed on record. In the present case of alleged medical negligence, the police report revealed that based on statement of doctors, hospital management and treatment record, no medical negligence was found in the treatment of victim. The report further reveled that operation was conducted very carefully and skillfully in the presence of all concerned, and the baby was delivered. However, the baby’s heart rate was weak. All specialist doctors made full efforts to save the baby and restore the heart rate, but the baby could not be saved.

5. However, upon perusal of the report, it does not appear that the allegations were inquired into by any medical expert, nor was the victim’s family associated with the inquiry. Furthermore, the reply from the CMO is also awaited, despite reminder dated 27.08.2025.  

6. Therefore, let final reminder be issued to the Chief Medical Officer, Sahibganj, Jharkhand, to submit action taken report, within four weeks.

7. A copy of this proceeding be also sent to the Dy. Commissioner, Sahibganj, Jharkhand, to ensure submission of action taken report by the CMO, within stipulated time as directed hereinabove.   

 
2.     It is therefore, requested that the additional/ complete report as directed by the Commission in the matter be sent latest by 25/01/2026, for futher consideration by the Commission.
 
3.     Any communication by public authorities in this matter may please be sent to the Commission through the HRCNet Portal (https://hrcnet.nic.in) by using id and password already provided to the public authorities (click Authority Login). Any Audio/ Video CDs/ pen drives etc. may be sent through Speed Post/ per bearer. The reports/ responses sent through email may not be entertained

Your’s faithfully
Sd/-
Atul Kumar
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (LAW)
M-5 Section
Ph. No. 011-24663287

CC to

Atul Kumar
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (LAW)
M-5 Section
Ph. No. 011-24663287

#JusticeForNewborn #RightToLife #MedicalNegligence #NHRC #Accountability #CompensationForVictims #NeonatalDeath #HumanRights

No comments: